QuestHealth (Quest Diagnostics)vsLetsGetChecked
QuestHealth (Quest Diagnostics)
LetsGetChecked
Side-by-side
| # | Product | Active ingredient | Starting price | FDA status | Score | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | QuestHealth (Quest Diagnostics) | — | Best ·$29/mo | service | Top ·8.2 | See offer → |
| 2 | LetsGetChecked | — | $89/mo | service | 7.5 | See offer → |
Side-by-side scoring breakdown
How they work
QuestHealth is a testing service, not a therapy. After you purchase online, an independent provider reviews the order for appropriateness. You then give a sample at a Quest center, via an in-home phlebotomist, or with a mail-in self-collection kit (blood finger-prick, saliva, urine, or swab) that you activate online and return in prepaid packaging. Quest's CLIA-certified labs run the assays and post results to your account.
You order a test online, and a discreet kit ships to your home. You self-collect the required sample, most commonly a capillary (finger-prick) blood sample, but also urine, a swab, or saliva depending on the test, then mail it back in prepaid packaging. The sample is processed at a CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited US laboratory using clinical-grade methods (for example, NAAT/PCR-type molecular testing for STIs and immunoassays for hormones and antibodies). A physician reviews the order and results, results post to a secure online dashboard in about 2 to 5 days after the lab receives the sample, and a nurse from the clinical team calls to explain any abnormal findings.
Effectiveness
Testing is performed in Quest Diagnostics' CLIA-certified laboratories using the same clinical assays ordered by physicians across the country, so the analytical accuracy matches conventional medical lab work rather than a consumer-grade approximation. The independent provider both authorizes the order and reviews results, adding a layer of clinical interpretation; screening tests (for example FIT colorectal kits) remain screens rather than diagnostic confirmations.
LetsGetChecked itself does not publish independent clinical-trial efficacy data; its accuracy rests on running samples through CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited labs using validated clinical methods. The most relevant published evidence is about self-collection itself: a PLOS One systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 studies and over 6,100 paired samples found self-collected vaginal swabs for chlamydia had 92% sensitivity (95% CI 87-95) and 98% specificity (95% CI 97-99) versus clinician-collected cervical swabs, supporting self-swab as a recommended home-screening specimen. Real-world accuracy still depends on correct self-collection, adequate sample volume, appropriate timing relative to exposure, and shipping conditions, so home results are not guaranteed to match a clinic draw in every case.
Side effects
As a lab service there is no drug exposure. Physical risk is limited to ordinary blood-draw effects (bruising, soreness, rare fainting) and is negligible for mail-in self-collection. The principal non-physical risk is misinterpreting an abnormal value without context, which is why provider review and follow-up with your own clinician are recommended. Individual results vary.
As a testing kit rather than a drug, LetsGetChecked has no pharmacologic side effects. Practical risks center on the finger-prick: minor pain, bruising, lightheadedness, or trouble getting enough blood, which can require a re-test. The more meaningful clinical risks are false negatives (missing a real condition because of collection error, low sample volume, or testing too soon after exposure) and false positives that cause unnecessary anxiety. Any actionable or abnormal result should be confirmed with a clinician before starting or stopping treatment.
Cost & value
As of 2026, tests start at $29 (such as the Proov progesterone kit), a vitamin D test is $75 plus a $6 physician service fee, and representative mail-in self-collection kits run around $79. In-home phlebotomy adds $79 where offered. The platform advertises that the price at checkout is what you pay with no surprise bills; FSA/HSA may apply. Pay out of pocket; results are not billed to insurance.
As of 2026, individual LetsGetChecked tests typically run from about $69 for basic single-marker tests to roughly $249 for the most comprehensive STI and wellness panels, with many common tests in the $89 to $199 range; a few advanced or multi-marker panels can reach the higher end of that scale. The company does not bill health insurance, so it is out-of-pocket, but you can usually pay with FSA/HSA funds, and subscriptions discount repeat testing by roughly 15% to 30% depending on frequency. Promotional codes and seasonal discounts appear periodically. For some routine labs, insurance-covered testing through your doctor or a discount lab may cost less.
Who it's for
Available to US consumers purchasing their own tests, with select pediatric tests for ages 9+ and in-home phlebotomy limited to ages 18+. An independent provider reviews each order for medical appropriateness. Self-collection kits cannot ship to AZ, AK, HI, or PR, or to PO/UPS boxes. Not a replacement for diagnostic care directed by your own physician.
Best for adults who want private, convenient screening or routine monitoring (STIs, cholesterol, HbA1c, thyroid, vitamin D, testosterone, female hormones) without a clinic visit, and who can pay out of pocket. Avoid relying on it if you have acute or severe symptoms, need an urgent or definitive diagnosis, are pregnant with high-risk concerns, or require insurance coverage. It is not a substitute for emergency care or for clinician-ordered diagnostics, and shipping is restricted in some states (historically tests have been limited in New York and not shipped to New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Alaska, with telehealth follow-up unavailable in several additional states). Always confirm abnormal results with your own provider.
Bottom line
LetsGetChecked: LetsGetChecked is a legitimate at-home testing service that mails you a kit to self-collect blood, urine, swab, or saliva samples, then analyzes them in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited US labs with physician review and free nurse follow-up for abnormal results. It is convenient and discreet, but it does not bill insurance and cannot replace clinician-ordered diagnostics or in-person care. On balance, QuestHealth (Quest Diagnostics) edges ahead in our scoring, but the right choice depends on your situation.
Sources behind our QuestHealth (Quest Diagnostics) and LetsGetChecked reviews
- QuestHealth official site (purchase your own lab tests) — Quest Diagnostics
- What is QuestHealth.com? Direct-to-Consumer Testing — Quest Diagnostics
- FAQs: Home Self-Collection Kits — Quest Diagnostics
- Vitamin D Test product page (pricing) — Quest Diagnostics
- At-Home Tests, Home Collection Kits & Quest Mobile Phlebotomy — Quest Diagnostics
- Quest Health Review: Services, Pricing, and Reliability — Healthline (2024)
- Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 — CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), Recommendations and Reports (2021)
- STI Screening Recommendations — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2021)
- Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (PMC full text) — MMWR Recommendations and Reports / PubMed Central (2021)
- Sexually Transmitted Infections: Updates From the 2021 CDC Guidelines — American Family Physician (AAFP) (2022)
- Self-Collected versus Clinician-Collected Sampling for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis — PLOS ONE (2015)
- Self-Collected versus Clinician-Collected Sampling for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PMC) — PLOS ONE / PubMed Central (2015)
- Self-collection of samples as an additional approach to deliver testing services for sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis — Journal of the International AIDS Society / PubMed Central (2019)
- At-home specimen self-collection as an additional testing strategy for chlamydia and gonorrhoea: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis — Sexually Transmitted Infections / PubMed Central (2024)
- Accuracy of self-collected versus healthcare worker collected specimens for diagnosing sexually transmitted infections in females: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis — BMC Infectious Diseases / PubMed Central (2024)
- Testing for extragenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis: At-home pharyngeal and rectal self-swabs are non-inferior to those completed in healthcare settings — Sexually Transmitted Diseases / PubMed Central (2024)
- Screening for HIV Infection: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement — U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2019)
- Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement — U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2021)
- The A1C Test & Diabetes — National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIH) (2018)
- Diabetes Tests & Diagnosis — National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIH) (2016)
- Additional 12 Million U.S. Adults Eligible for Diabetes Screening — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2022)
- Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement — U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2021)
- Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis — Annals of Internal Medicine / PubMed Central (2014)
- Performance Characteristics of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenomatous Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis — Annals of Internal Medicine (PubMed) (2019)
- USPSTF Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendation and Uptake for Individuals Aged 45 to 49 Years — JAMA Network Open / PubMed Central (2024)
- Statin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement — U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2016)
- Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement — U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2018)
- Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement (PubMed) — JAMA (PubMed) (2018)
- Thyroid Function Tests — American Thyroid Association (2019)
- Hypothyroidism (Underactive Thyroid) — American Thyroid Association (2019)
- Vitamin D Deficiency — StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf (National Library of Medicine) (2025)
- Vitamin D — MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine (NIH) (2023)
- A randomised study of nurse collected venous blood and self-collected dried blood spots for the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors in the Understanding Society Innovation Panel — Scientific Reports (Nature) (2023)
- Meet Our Lab: CLIA-Certified and CAP-Accredited Laboratory — LetsGetChecked (2024)
- Are the tests performed by LetsGetChecked's partner laboratories the same as tests performed by other healthcare facilities? — LetsGetChecked Help Center (2024)
- A Look Inside a CAP Laboratory Audit — LetsGetChecked (2023)
Editorial comparison, not medical advice. Discuss options with a qualified clinician. Individual results vary.